Home

Wed, Aug. 3rd, 2005, 02:54 pm
Influences: Psychism

I have decided to kick off a series of posts on this blog about my various spiritual/occult influences. I will be making brief posts about each influence roughly in the order that they entered my life, and detailing the ways in which they influence my practice. Each influence will receive a separate post. Those that find these posts self-indugent and narcissistic are probably right, but should know that I am actually just bouncing some thoughts off the journal and taking stock of myself.

The very first influence, I am going to handle under the title PSYCHISM, which is not exactly right, but the best that I can think of.

No one in my ancestry, with the possible exception of a Danish “water-witch” from the late 1800’s had any kind of systematic magickal practice that I know of. That being said, many people in my family history were prone to experiences including both my parents and grandparents. I have already written about my first mystical experiences and spirit visitation in this journal and in Behutet magazine, so I will not rehash the details here. Apart from what I have written about, when I was about 10 years old or so, I began to perceive what I can only describe as Patterns of Probability. I could literally feel these patters in the ether or in the awareness and tweak them slightly. I noted that particular sequences of thoughts and ways of breathing or flexing muscles in the head would produce certain effects in those around me. These were my first experiments with practical thaumaturgy.

What is pertinent about this influence is that I had these experiences without training or the aid of rituals, drugs, prayer or any system or symbol set whatsoever. The reason that this is an important influence is that it firmly placed any religion or symbol set that I would ever encounter as SECONDARY to direct experience and results. This is one reason that I am so perplexed by the way people get so into combining symbol sets without really accomplishing something new or coming up with endless variants on the same rituals that essentially do the exact same thing. Use the boat to cross the river than leave it there is my philosophy, but many people seem far more concerned about what color the boat is, or if they can paint it paisley, than its actual usefulness.

Another important reason to understand Psychism as my original spark, is that I did’nt choose this life. I feel compelled to it by experience. I did not get involved in magick to be different, or as a counter culture statement, or to get rich, or get chicks. If wasn’t called to it, I wouldn’t do it at all. I literally feel that I have no choice in the matter. Once, for reasons I will keep to myself, I quit the path. I became ill, went mildly wonky in the head for a week, and had a bad accident. These all seemed to be threats by the universe for me to get back on the path, which I did.

I don’t think that everyone is cut out for it magick, and thus don’t see it as something to proselytize. I believe a lot of the people practicing magick actually have very little aptitude for it. These tend to be the magicians pushing for a more psychological magickal model, or Witches who would like to forget spellcraft and just worship. Some of the work done by these folks is very valuable, and they can call themselves mages and witches if they like, but what they do and what I do are to very different things.

Even when I began to take an interest in reading about what it is I was experiencing I read stuff on Psychics and Parapsychology that an Aunt of mine loaned to me. It was not until I was 14 that encountered the occult proper, which I will write about in the next post which will be about CEREMONIAL MAGICK.

Wed, Aug. 3rd, 2005 10:02 pm (UTC)
[info]perruche_verte

I really, really appreciate you taking the time to write about your influences and your outlook.

Maybe I fall into the realm of those you describe who are more worshippers than magicians, but at a certain point I began to suspect that the bulk of what I practiced was really just assorted pathetic attempts to prop up my ego, and that maybe the thing to do was to let that fall down and then see what happened. That's part of what led me to Vajrayana and makes me want to begin ngondro.

And that leads me off the immediate topic of your post - but I am interested in the magical (magickal?) functions of Vajrayana practice you've mentioned in the past, and I just wonder how that squares with the general goal of non-attachment in Buddhism.

I mean, we all have to live. Today I suddenly and unexpectedly came to a point in my day job where I'm no longer sure I can go on there. Arguably, at this point I'm sort of attached to being able to pay my rent so I can live and do dharma practice. But is doing specific practice with specific material ends in mind contrary to the ultimate goal of enlightenment? I'd appreciate your thoughts on this (and your prayers, if you're feeling charitable).

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 03:19 am (UTC)
[info]inominandum

Not everyone is cut out to be an aesetic yogi with no possesssions. For most, that lifestyle would hinder the search for enlightenment more than it helps. If we accept this, than we accept the basic model of Maslows Hierarchy of needs which basically says that its difficult to focus on Self actualization if we dont have a roof over our head and food on our plate.

The degree to which we engage samsara with magick is up to us. I myself find that as long as Thaumaturgy does not take the place of Theurgia in ones life, that its all good.

From the Dzogchen perspective, this duality really doesnt exist at all.

If you send me your real name and birthday and any other details you feel pertinent I will be happy to set a light for you and say a prayer or four.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 01:51 am (UTC)
[info]chemalfait

I agree that many are not cut out for magic, yet even so I think the process of magic is inherent within our etheric anatomy. In the tradition in which I am an initiate of, magic is very simple. It's basically a matter of 'breathing'. Even so, many seem bent on making it more complex than it really needs to be.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 03:20 am (UTC)
[info]inominandum

What tradition are you from? It also depends on what we are defining as magick. Some things can be accomplished well with just breathing. some cant. some can but could be done better with some other techniques.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 10:19 am (UTC)
[info]chemalfait

I'm a Feri witch.
Sure it depends on what one defines as magic.
We 'breathe' on different levels. Taking in transforming and sending out. For me breath is foundational. I'm not discounting or excluding other techniques, just saying some folks make things overly cumbersome, and in doing so create distraction from their goal.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 07:20 pm (UTC)
[info]inominandum

I have a great respect for Feri. If I ever find myself near a teacher I may even seek initiation one day.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 07:55 pm (UTC)
[info]chemalfait

If you ever make it down Cape May way, give me a heads up, and maybe we can get together.
I'm also on Mid-Atlantic Pagan Alliance list.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 11:59 am (UTC)
[info]skyefyr: Thank You For Sharing

I want to take a moment to say thank you. Thank you for reminding me that ultimately, the boat is just a vessel to get you from one location to another. It doesn't matter the color or size or type, as long as it performs it's duty.

I've recently wanted to perform some spellwork but have gotten so tied up in the little things, I forgot that they aren't what's important. The intent behind it is. I got caught up in the trivial and forgot the magic. Thank you for the reminder.

I'm looking forward to more posts from you about your experiences.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 07:21 pm (UTC)
[info]inominandum: Re: Thank You For Sharing

The intent behind it IS important, but so are the materia and such. What details are you getting caught up in?

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 10:01 pm (UTC)
[info]skyefyr: Re: Thank You For Sharing

I'm doing candle magic. I wasn't able to find the kind of candle I wanted and decided to make it instead. I got caught up in using black to destroy something. I realize that with the herbs and oils I'm using, I don't *have* to use black. Either not coloring it or using white may actually be better (I have white coloring). White will send forth the intentions and power from the herbs and oils forth in a "pure" manner. Seeing your words made me realize that black wasn't that important, and I was able to "step back" and rethink things a bit. I'm now very happy with the change and can make it in a way I focus the intent properly instead of having a doubt in the back of my mind because something wasn't "right". I think that mindset will be more important in the creation of this candle than anything else could be.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 12:53 pm (UTC)
[info]ncalrod

Do you think "PSYCHISM" to barrow your word is something that some that you have to born exclusively or do you think that it is something that you can learn through study and meditation? Just curious on your opinion.

Thu, Aug. 4th, 2005 07:23 pm (UTC)
[info]inominandum

Kind of like Art I suppose. Some uncover the gift naturally and then benefit from training. Some dont uncover thier gift until they recieve training. Some dont do very well even after they recieve training.

This all has NOTHING to do with enlightenment BTW. Enlightenment is not dependent on being able to reach an altered state of consiousness.